Ahmedova, whose work captures the lives and traditions of ordinary Uzbeks, attracted international attention in 2009, when she was arrested and convicted of “slandering the Uzbek nation” in a series that issued the BBC website.Īlthough Karimov forgave her, a glance at his harmless-looking photographs reveals the president’s artistic ideal: Uzbekistan had to be portrayed as a clean, organized, prosperous and modern country. Renegade artists that attract attention, such as Weil and photographer Umida Ahmedova, have problems. But in the following years the development of two great centers of progressive art was allowed: the collection of lost art of the thirties by Igor Savitsky, hidden in the Savitsky Museum of Nukus, and the stories of the life of the legendary Ilkhom theater of the ill-fated Mark Weil, in Tashkent.Ĭontemporary art, like the media, is under the strict control of the Government. Traditional art, music and architecture were preserved as gold cloth after the Soviet creation of the Uzbekistan RSS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |